Question · asked by 1 review
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Biodentine: Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success)
- Population
- Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure
- Intervention
- Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
- Comparison
- Biodentine
- Outcome
- Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success)
MTA and Biodentine have similar pulpotomy success (OR 0.89, not significant; low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Biodentine Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months MTA and Biodentine have similar pulpotomy success (OR 0.89, not significant; low certainty). Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024) All outcomes | OR 0.89 [0.47, 1.69] | 6 studies · 348 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 2024 All outcomes | 2023-08-31 | 25 | Low / Critically Low |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · 2 reviews
- Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing pulpotomy · 1 review
- Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH) · Vital permanent teeth (mature or immature) with deep or extremely deep caries and… · 1 review
- Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · 1 review
- Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in immature permanent teeth · 1 review
- Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs TotalFill BC · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · 1 review
- Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth with mixed root development · 1 review
- Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · 1 review
- Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing direct pulp capping · 1 review
- Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in mature permanent teeth · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.