Question · asked by 1 review

Prenatal vitamin D level ≤50 nmol/L vs Adequate prenatal vitamin D (sufficient maternal 25(OH)D): Dental caries

Population
Children aged 2 to 8 years
Intervention
Prenatal vitamin D level ≤50 nmol/L
Comparison
Adequate prenatal vitamin D (sufficient maternal 25(OH)D)
Outcome
Dental caries

The review reported a lower odds ratio at maternal prenatal vitamin D ≤50 nmol/L than at ≤35 nmol/L, without a numeric value in the available sources.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Prenatal vitamin D level ≤50 nmol/L vs Normal or sufficient prenatal vitamin D level
Dental caries · Children aged 2 to 8 years · Maternal pregnancy to child age 2 to 8 years, Mostly developed countries (Europe and America), Vitamin D threshold ≤50 nmol/L
The review reported a lower odds ratio at maternal prenatal vitamin D ≤50 nmol/L than at ≤35 nmol/L, without a numeric value in the available sources.
Association between prenatal vitamin D deficiency with dental caries in infants and children: a systematic… (2024) All outcomes
OR 1.30 [1.17, 1.43]4 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Association between prenatal vitamin D deficiency with dental caries in infants and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
2024 All outcomes
5 October 2023 (search range 2000 to October 2023)16Not applicable
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.