Question · asked by 1 review
Single‐incision slings vs retropubic minimally‐invasive slings: Patient‐reported pain: at more than 24 months
- Population
- women with urinary incontinence
- Intervention
- Single‐incision slings
- Comparison
- retropubic minimally‐invasive slings
- Outcome
- Patient‐reported pain: at more than 24 months
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Single‐incision slings vs retropubic minimally‐invasive slings Patient‐reported pain: at more than 24 months · women with urinary incontinence The review found no eligible studies for this question. Single‐incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single‐incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings · women with urinary incontinence · 1 review
- Single‐incision slings vs autologous fascial slings · women with urinary incontinence · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.