Primary care physician alerting system and a patient‐directed intervention (education and reminder to see their primary care physician) vs usual care: Bone mineral density
Primary care physician alerting system and a patient‐directed… leads to higher bone Mineral Density 1 compared with standard care (high certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary care physician alerting system and a patient‐directed intervention (education and reminder to see their primary care physician) vs standard care Bone Mineral Density 1 · General practitioners/family doctors involved in the management of patients with osteoporosis Primary care physician alerting system and a patient‐directed… leads to higher bone Mineral Density 1 compared with standard care (high certainty). Professional interventions for general practitioners on the management of musculoskeletal conditions (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 4.44 [3.54, 5.55] | 3 studies · 3386 participants | High |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Professional interventions for general practitioners on the management of musculoskeletal conditions 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.