Question · asked by 1 review
Brief intervention vs information only: Alcohol quantity Self report questionnaires Medium‐term
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Brief intervention vs information provision Alcohol quantity Self report questionnaires Medium‐term · Substance‐using adolescents Brief school‐based interventions and behavioural outcomes for substance‐using adolescents (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 434 participants | Moderate |
Brief intervention vs information provision Alcohol quantity Self‐Report Questionnaires · Substance‐using adolescents Brief school‐based interventions and behavioural outcomes for substance‐using adolescents (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD008969.PUB2, superseded | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 527 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brief school‐based interventions and behavioural outcomes for substance‐using adolescents 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.