Question · asked by 1 review
Probiotics vs control: Adverse events
- Population
- patients with acute pancreatitis
- Intervention
- Probiotics
- Comparison
- control
- Outcome
- Adverse events
Probiotics showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with control (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Probiotics vs control Adverse events · patients with acute pancreatitis Probiotics showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with control (low certainty). Enteral nutrition formulations for acute pancreatitis (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.18 [0.33, 4.2] | 2 studies · 133 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enteral nutrition formulations for acute pancreatitis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Probiotics vs placebo · participants with cancer treated with radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) · 1 review
- Probiotics vs placebo · participants with cancer treated with chemotherapy · 1 review
- Probiotics vs placebo · children up to age 18 years · 1 review
- Probiotics vs placebo · adult patients after liver transplantation. · 1 review
- Probiotics vs other active intervention · participants with cancer treated with radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) · 1 review
- Probiotics vs antibiotic prophylaxis · primary VUR · 1 review
- Probiotics vs placebo · Patients with collagenous colitis · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.