Question · asked by 1 review

Acupuncture vs oral corticosteroid: Overall clinical improvement at long‐term

It is very uncertain whether acupuncture changes overall clinical improvement at long‐term compared with oral corticosteroid (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Acupuncture vs oral corticosteroid
Overall clinical improvement at long‐term · carpal tunnel syndrome
Acupuncture and related interventions for the treatment of symptoms associated with carpal tunnel syndrome (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted1 study · 77 participantsVery low
Acupuncture vs oral corticosteroid
Overall clinical improvement at long‐term · carpal tunnel syndrome
It is very uncertain whether acupuncture changes overall clinical improvement at long‐term compared with oral corticosteroid (very low certainty).
Acupuncture and related interventions for the treatment of symptoms associated with carpal tunnel syndrome (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.34 [1.05, 1.72]1 study · 77 participantsVery low
Acupuncture vs oral corticosteroid
Overall clinical improvement at long‐term · carpal tunnel syndrome
It is very uncertain whether acupuncture changes overall clinical improvement at long‐term compared with oral corticosteroid (very low certainty).
Acupuncture and related interventions for the treatment of symptoms associated with carpal tunnel syndrome (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.73 [1.22, 2.45]1 study · 77 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Acupuncture and related interventions for the treatment of symptoms associated with carpal tunnel syndrome
2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.