Question · asked by 1 review

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) vs Children and adolescents without JIA (healthy peers): Dental erosive wear

Population
Children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)
Intervention
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)
Comparison
Children and adolescents without JIA (healthy peers)
Outcome
Dental erosive wear

No eligible studies reported dental erosive wear, so its association with JIA could not be assessed (evidence gap).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) vs Children and adolescents without JIA (healthy peers)
Dental erosive wear · Children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)
No eligible studies reported dental erosive wear, so its association with JIA could not be assessed (evidence gap).
Oral health in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis - a systematic review and… (2019) All outcomes
The present review lacked studies with focus on erosive wear; it concluded that for dental erosive wear there is no scientific evidence to answer the posed research questions.0 studiesNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Oral health in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
2019 All outcomes
25 November 201820Not applicable
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.