Question · asked by 1 review
Home‐based vs centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation: Exercise capacity
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Home‐based vs centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation Exercise capacity ≤ 12 months* · Patients with heart disease Home‐based versus centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 24 studies · 2343 participants | Moderate |
Home‐based vs supervised centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation Exercise capacity ≤ 12 months Validated outcome measure (e.g. VO₂ peak, 6 minute walk test) · Patients with heart disease Home‐based versus centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD007130.PUB4, superseded | no estimate extracted | 22 studies · 2255 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home‐based versus centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.