Question · asked by 1 review
Extensive tests vs tests at the physician's discretion: Time to cancer diagnosis7
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Extensive tests vs tests at the physician's discretion Time to cancer diagnosis9 · people with unprovoked VTE Effect of testing for cancer on cancer‐ or venous thromboembolism (VTE)‐related mortality and morbidity in… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 201 participants | GRADE not reported |
Extensive tests vs tests at the physician's discretion Time to cancer diagnosis9 · people with unprovoked VTE Effect of testing for cancer on cancer‐ or venous thromboembolism (VTE)‐related mortality and morbidity in… (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD010837.PUB4, superseded | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 201 participants | GRADE not reported |
Extensive tests vs tests at the physician's discretion Time to cancer diagnosis9 · people with unprovoked VTE Effect of testing for cancer on cancer‐ or venous thromboembolism (VTE)‐related mortality and morbidity in… (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD010837.PUB3, superseded | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 201 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effect of testing for cancer on cancer‐ or venous thromboembolism (VTE)‐related mortality and morbidity in people with unprovoked VTE 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.