Multifactorial interventions vs usual care or attention control: Falls
Multifactorial interventions may leads to lower rate of falls (falls per person years) compared with usual care or attention control (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Multifactorial interventions vs usual care or attention control Rate of falls (falls per person years) · Older people living in the community Multifactorial interventions may leads to lower rate of falls (falls per person years) compared with usual care or attention control (low certainty). Multifactorial and multiple component interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the… (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Rate ratio 0.77 [0.67, 0.87] | 19 studies · 5853 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multifactorial and multiple component interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.