Summary of findings table ‐ CBT without antipsychotics vs CBT plus antipsychotics: Global state ‐ number of participants with relapse/exacerbations of psychosis (separated time points) ‐ < 12 months
- Population
- schizophrenia
- Intervention
- Summary of findings table ‐ CBT without antipsychotics
- Comparison
- CBT plus antipsychotics
- Outcome
- Global state ‐ number of participants with relapse/exacerbations of psychosis (separated time points) ‐ < 12 months
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ CBT without antipsychotics changes global state ‐ number of participants with relapse/exacerbations of… compared with CBT plus antipsychotics (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ CBT without antipsychotics vs CBT plus antipsychotics Global state ‐ number of participants with relapse/exacerbations of psychosis (separated time points) ‐ < 12 months · schizophrenia It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ CBT without antipsychotics changes global state ‐ number of participants with relapse/exacerbations of… compared with CBT plus antipsychotics (very low certainty). Cognitive behavioural therapy without medication for schizophrenia (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 2.89 [0.12, 67.75] | 1 study · 90 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive behavioural therapy without medication for schizophrenia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Summary of findings table ‐ CBT without antipsychotics vs antipsychotics · schizophrenia · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.