Question · asked by 1 review
Chlorhexidine 0.2% vs Normal saline: Change in periapical radiolucency (radiography or CBCT), up to 1 year after treatment
- Population
- Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or periapical pathology, undergoing non-surgical root canal treatment
- Intervention
- Chlorhexidine 0.2%
- Comparison
- Normal saline
- Outcome
- Change in periapical radiolucency (radiography or CBCT), up to 1 year after treatment
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Chlorhexidine 0.2% vs Normal saline Change in periapical radiolucency (radiography or CBCT), up to 1 year after treatment · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or… The review found no eligible studies for this question. Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes | no estimate extracted | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2012-07 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.