Question · asked by 1 review

Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure ventilation vs control: Less than 30% FiO2 after 1 hour of therapy

It is very uncertain whether continuous negative extrathoracic pressure ventilation changes less than 30% FiO2 after 1 hour of therapy compared with control (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure ventilation vs control
Less than 30% FiO2 after 1 hour of therapy · children with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure
It is very uncertain whether continuous negative extrathoracic pressure ventilation changes less than 30% FiO2 after 1 hour of therapy compared with control (very low certainty).
Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure or continuous positive airway pressure compared to conventional… (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 10.69 [0.62, 183.85]1 study · 33 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure or continuous positive airway pressure compared to conventional ventilation for acute…
2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.