Question · asked by 1 review

ACP light-cure adhesive vs Conventional/control orthodontic adhesive (e.g., Transbond XT) or negative control: Enamel demineralization (DIAGNOdent score)

Population
Orthodontic patients of any age with fixed braces (new DLs assessed at debond)
Intervention
ACP light-cure adhesive
Comparison
Conventional/control orthodontic adhesive (e.g., Transbond XT) or negative control
Outcome
Enamel demineralization (DIAGNOdent score)

ACP adhesive had lower demineralization scores at 1 month, with certainty not graded.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
ACP light-cure adhesive vs Control Transbond XT adhesive
Enamel demineralization score · Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment · 1 month after bonding, Fixed orthodontic treatment
ACP adhesive had lower demineralization scores at 1 month, with certainty not graded.
Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed… (2024) All outcomes
At T1, the control group had an average demineralization score of 3.39 (±1.29), whereas the ACP group had a notably lower average score of 2.58 (±1.11) (p-value of 0.000).1 study · 26 participantsGRADE not reported
ACP light-cure adhesive vs Control Transbond XT adhesive
Enamel demineralization score · Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment · 6 months after bonding, Fixed orthodontic treatment
ACP adhesive had lower demineralization scores at 6 months, with certainty not graded.
Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed… (2024) All outcomes
At T2, the control group had an average score of 4.32 (±2.32), while the ACP group continued to exhibit a lower average score of 3.41 (±1.11) (p-value of 0.000).1 study · 26 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.