Primary study · included by 1 review
Alshammari et al. 2019
ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Enamel demineralization score ACP light-cure adhesive vs Control Transbond XT adhesive · 1 month after bonding | At T1, the control group had an average demineralization score of 3.39 (±1.29), whereas the ACP group had a notably lower average score of 2.58 (±1.11) (p-value of 0.000). | 1 study · 26 participants | Ungraded |
Enamel demineralization (DIAGNOdent) Amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP)-containing light-cure adhesive vs Conventional adhesive (Transbond XT) · 1 and 6 months | Alshammari 2019 (1 triple-blinded RCT, 26 patients / 255 teeth): DIAGNOdent demineralization scores were lower with ACP than control at 1 month (2.58 +/-1.11 vs 3.39 +/-1.29) and 6 months (3.41 +/-1.11 vs 4.32… | 1 study · 26 participants | Ungraded |
Enamel demineralization score ACP light-cure adhesive vs Control Transbond XT adhesive · 6 months after bonding | At T2, the control group had an average score of 4.32 (±2.32), while the ACP group continued to exhibit a lower average score of 3.41 (±1.11) (p-value of 0.000). | 1 study · 26 participants | Ungraded |
1 including review in total.