Question · asked by 1 review
Nocturnal breastfeeding vs No nocturnal breastfeeding: Early childhood caries (ECC)
- Population
- Preschool children (<6 years)
- Intervention
- Nocturnal breastfeeding
- Comparison
- No nocturnal breastfeeding
- Outcome
- Early childhood caries (ECC)
After excluding one study, nocturnal breastfeeding was associated with higher ECC risk (RR 3.05, 95% CI 2.40 to 3.87; I²=33%).
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Nocturnal breastfeeding vs No nocturnal breastfeeding Dental caries (ECC) · Preschool children under 6 years of age · First dental examination before age 6 years, Clinical, field, or unclear dental examination settings, Cohort studies; sensitivity analysis excluding study 39 After excluding one study, nocturnal breastfeeding was associated with higher ECC risk (RR 3.05, 95% CI 2.40 to 3.87; I²=33%). Association of Breastfeeding and Early Childhood Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2024) All outcomes | RR 3.05 [2.40, 3.87] | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Nocturnal breastfeeding vs No nocturnal breastfeeding Dental caries (early childhood caries) · Preschool children (<6 years) · Preschool children in high- and middle-income countries; caries assessed in clinical or field/community settings, Cohort studies Nocturnal breastfeeding was associated with a significantly increased risk of early childhood caries (RR 2.35, 95% CI 1.42-3.89; substantial heterogeneity; ungraded). Association of Breastfeeding and Early Childhood Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2024) All outcomes | RR 2.35 [1.42, 3.89] | 3 studies · 1590 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Association of Breastfeeding and Early Childhood Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2024 All outcomes | 13 May 2023 (databases searched from inception) | 61 | Not applicable |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.