Question · asked by 1 review
Metformin‐sulphonylurea (second‐ or third‐generation) combination therapy vs metformin plus another antidiabetic drug: All‐cause mortality
- Population
- Not specified
- Intervention
- Metformin‐sulphonylurea (second‐ or third‐generation) combination therapy
- Comparison
- metformin plus another antidiabetic drug
- Outcome
- All‐cause mortality
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Metformin‐sulphonylurea (second‐ or third‐generation) combination therapy vs metformin plus another antidiabetic drug All‐cause mortality (N) The review found no eligible studies for this question. Metformin and second‐ or third‐generation sulphonylurea combination therapy for adults with type 2 diabetes… (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metformin and second‐ or third‐generation sulphonylurea combination therapy for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.