Question · asked by 1 review
Lower salt intake vs usual or high salt intake: Systolic blood pressure
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Reduced salt intake vs usual or high salt intake Systolic BP: long‐term studies Duration: up to 12 weeks · patients with diabetes with or without CKD Altered dietary salt intake for preventing diabetic kidney disease and its progression (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 7 studies · 288 participants | Low |
Reduced salt intake vs usual or high salt intake Systolic BP: short‐term studies Duration: 1 week · patients with diabetes with or without CKD Altered dietary salt intake for preventing diabetic kidney disease and its progression (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 112 participants | Low |
Net change in blood pressure in hypertensive and normotensive participants with a reduced salt intake vs usual or high salt intake Systolic BP Duration: up to 12 weeks · patients with diabetes with or without CKD Altered dietary salt intake for preventing diabetic kidney disease and its progression (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 108 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Altered dietary salt intake for preventing diabetic kidney disease and its progression 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.