Dental caries vs Adolescents without dental caries: Negative oral-health impact on daily performance (OIDP or Child-OIDP)
- Population
- Adolescents (10-19 years)
- Intervention
- Dental caries
- Comparison
- Adolescents without dental caries
- Outcome
- Negative oral-health impact on daily performance (OIDP or Child-OIDP)
In the Child-OIDP subgroup, dental caries is associated with a worse oral-health impact: PR 1.66 (95% CI 1.19 to 2.31) from 6 studies (I2=96%); ungraded, and not statistically different from the OIDP subgroup (p=0.96).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Dental caries (presence or experience) vs Adolescents without dental caries Negative oral-health impact on daily performance measured by Child-OIDP · Adolescents aged 10 to 19 years · Cross-sectional (concurrent exposure and outcome); oral impacts recalled over the prior 6 months, School-based (17/20 studies), plus household and secondary-data surveys; low-, middle- and high-income countries (Brazil, Thailand, Tanzania, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Zambia, Iran, Serbia, Nepal, India, South Africa, China), Instrument subgroup: Child-OIDP In the Child-OIDP subgroup, dental caries is associated with a worse oral-health impact: PR 1.66 (95% CI 1.19 to 2.31) from 6 studies (I2=96%); ungraded, and not statistically different from the OIDP subgroup (p=0.96). Impact of dental caries on the quality of life of adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes | PR 1.66 [1.19, 2.31] | 6 studies | GRADE not reported |
Dental caries (presence or experience) vs Adolescents without dental caries Negative oral-health impact on daily performance measured by OIDP · Adolescents aged 10 to 19 years · Cross-sectional (concurrent exposure and outcome); oral impacts recalled over the prior 6 months, School-based (17/20 studies), plus household and secondary-data surveys; low-, middle- and high-income countries (Brazil, Thailand, Tanzania, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Zambia, Iran, Serbia, Nepal, India, South Africa, China), Instrument subgroup: OIDP (all 3 studies) In the OIDP subgroup, the association of dental caries with oral-health impact was not statistically significant: PR 1.68 (95% CI 0.89 to 3.17) from 3 studies (I2=94%); ungraded. Impact of dental caries on the quality of life of adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes | PR 1.68 [0.89, 3.17] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Dental caries (presence or experience) vs Adolescents without dental caries Negative oral-health impact on daily performance measured by OIDP · Adolescents aged 10 to 19 years · Cross-sectional (concurrent exposure and outcome); oral impacts recalled over the prior 6 months, School-based (17/20 studies), plus household and secondary-data surveys; low-, middle- and high-income countries (Brazil, Thailand, Tanzania, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Zambia, Iran, Serbia, Nepal, India, South Africa, China), Instrument subgroup: OIDP, sensitivity analysis excluding Krisdapong et al. When Krisdapong et al. was removed from the OIDP subgroup, heterogeneity disappeared (I2=0%) and the association became significant: PR 1.21 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.28) from 2 studies; ungraded sensitivity analysis. Impact of dental caries on the quality of life of adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes | PR 1.21 [1.15, 1.28] | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Dental caries (presence or experience) vs Adolescents without dental caries Negative oral-health impact on daily performance (OIDP or Child-OIDP) · Adolescents aged 10 to 19 years · Cross-sectional (concurrent exposure and outcome); oral impacts recalled over the prior 6 months, School-based (17/20 studies), plus household and secondary-data surveys; low-, middle- and high-income countries (Brazil, Thailand, Tanzania, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Zambia, Iran, Serbia, Nepal, India, South Africa, China), Overall (all meta-analyzed studies pooled; both instruments and both caries definitions) Dental caries is associated with a worse oral-health impact on adolescents' daily performance: pooled PR 1.52 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.01) from 9 cross-sectional studies with very high heterogeneity (I2=97%); the body of evidence was not GRADE-rated (ungraded). Impact of dental caries on the quality of life of adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes | PR 1.52 [1.15, 2.01] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Presence of dental caries vs Adolescents without dental caries Negative oral-health impact on daily performance (OIDP or Child-OIDP) · Adolescents aged 10 to 19 years · Cross-sectional (concurrent exposure and outcome); oral impacts recalled over the prior 6 months, School-based (17/20 studies), plus household and secondary-data surveys; low-, middle- and high-income countries (Brazil, Thailand, Tanzania, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Zambia, Iran, Serbia, Nepal, India, South Africa, China), Caries-definition subgroup: presence of dental caries For presence of dental caries, the pooled association with oral-health impact was not statistically significant: PR 1.19 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.84) from 3 studies (I2=96%); ungraded. Impact of dental caries on the quality of life of adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes | PR 1.19 [0.77, 1.84] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact of dental caries on the quality of life of adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 2025 All outcomes | January 2022; updated March 2024 (studies up until March 2024) | 22 | Not applicable |
Studies behind the findings
The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.
- Assessing association of dental caries with child oral impact on daily performance; a cross-sectional study of adolescents in Copperbelt… · 2023 · included by 1 of these review
- Oral impacts on daily performances and its socio-demographic and clinical distribution: a cross-sectional study of adolescents living in… · 2020 · included by 1 of these review
- Association between oral diseases and impact on daily performance among male Saudi schoolchildren. · 2019 · included by 1 of these review
- Social vulnerability and factors associated with oral impact on daily performance among adolescents. · 2017 · included by 1 of these review
- Sociodemographic Factors and Oral Health Conditions Related to the Impact on the Quality of Life of Adolescents · 2016 · included by 1 of these review
- Oral health impact, dental caries experience, and associated factors in 12–15-year-old school children in India · 2015 · included by 1 of these review
- Impacts on Quality of Life Related to Dental Caries in a National Representative Sample of Thai 12- and 15-Year-Olds · 2012 · included by 1 of these review
- Applicability of an abbreviated version of the Child-OIDP inventory among primary schoolchildren in Tanzania. · 2007 · included by 1 of these review
- Wu et al. 2021 · included by 1 of these review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.