Question · asked by 1 review

Dental caries vs Adolescents without dental caries: Negative oral-health impact on daily performance (OIDP or Child-OIDP)

Population
Adolescents (10-19 years)
Intervention
Dental caries
Comparison
Adolescents without dental caries
Outcome
Negative oral-health impact on daily performance (OIDP or Child-OIDP)

In the Child-OIDP subgroup, dental caries is associated with a worse oral-health impact: PR 1.66 (95% CI 1.19 to 2.31) from 6 studies (I2=96%); ungraded, and not statistically different from the OIDP subgroup (p=0.96).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 5 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Dental caries (presence or experience) vs Adolescents without dental caries
Negative oral-health impact on daily performance measured by Child-OIDP · Adolescents aged 10 to 19 years · Cross-sectional (concurrent exposure and outcome); oral impacts recalled over the prior 6 months, School-based (17/20 studies), plus household and secondary-data surveys; low-, middle- and high-income countries (Brazil, Thailand, Tanzania, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Zambia, Iran, Serbia, Nepal, India, South Africa, China), Instrument subgroup: Child-OIDP
In the Child-OIDP subgroup, dental caries is associated with a worse oral-health impact: PR 1.66 (95% CI 1.19 to 2.31) from 6 studies (I2=96%); ungraded, and not statistically different from the OIDP subgroup (p=0.96).
Impact of dental caries on the quality of life of adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
PR 1.66 [1.19, 2.31]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Dental caries (presence or experience) vs Adolescents without dental caries
Negative oral-health impact on daily performance measured by OIDP · Adolescents aged 10 to 19 years · Cross-sectional (concurrent exposure and outcome); oral impacts recalled over the prior 6 months, School-based (17/20 studies), plus household and secondary-data surveys; low-, middle- and high-income countries (Brazil, Thailand, Tanzania, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Zambia, Iran, Serbia, Nepal, India, South Africa, China), Instrument subgroup: OIDP (all 3 studies)
In the OIDP subgroup, the association of dental caries with oral-health impact was not statistically significant: PR 1.68 (95% CI 0.89 to 3.17) from 3 studies (I2=94%); ungraded.
Impact of dental caries on the quality of life of adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
PR 1.68 [0.89, 3.17]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Dental caries (presence or experience) vs Adolescents without dental caries
Negative oral-health impact on daily performance measured by OIDP · Adolescents aged 10 to 19 years · Cross-sectional (concurrent exposure and outcome); oral impacts recalled over the prior 6 months, School-based (17/20 studies), plus household and secondary-data surveys; low-, middle- and high-income countries (Brazil, Thailand, Tanzania, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Zambia, Iran, Serbia, Nepal, India, South Africa, China), Instrument subgroup: OIDP, sensitivity analysis excluding Krisdapong et al.
When Krisdapong et al. was removed from the OIDP subgroup, heterogeneity disappeared (I2=0%) and the association became significant: PR 1.21 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.28) from 2 studies; ungraded sensitivity analysis.
Impact of dental caries on the quality of life of adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
PR 1.21 [1.15, 1.28]2 studiesGRADE not reported
Dental caries (presence or experience) vs Adolescents without dental caries
Negative oral-health impact on daily performance (OIDP or Child-OIDP) · Adolescents aged 10 to 19 years · Cross-sectional (concurrent exposure and outcome); oral impacts recalled over the prior 6 months, School-based (17/20 studies), plus household and secondary-data surveys; low-, middle- and high-income countries (Brazil, Thailand, Tanzania, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Zambia, Iran, Serbia, Nepal, India, South Africa, China), Overall (all meta-analyzed studies pooled; both instruments and both caries definitions)
Dental caries is associated with a worse oral-health impact on adolescents' daily performance: pooled PR 1.52 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.01) from 9 cross-sectional studies with very high heterogeneity (I2=97%); the body of evidence was not GRADE-rated (ungraded).
Impact of dental caries on the quality of life of adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
PR 1.52 [1.15, 2.01]9 studiesGRADE not reported
Presence of dental caries vs Adolescents without dental caries
Negative oral-health impact on daily performance (OIDP or Child-OIDP) · Adolescents aged 10 to 19 years · Cross-sectional (concurrent exposure and outcome); oral impacts recalled over the prior 6 months, School-based (17/20 studies), plus household and secondary-data surveys; low-, middle- and high-income countries (Brazil, Thailand, Tanzania, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Zambia, Iran, Serbia, Nepal, India, South Africa, China), Caries-definition subgroup: presence of dental caries
For presence of dental caries, the pooled association with oral-health impact was not statistically significant: PR 1.19 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.84) from 3 studies (I2=96%); ungraded.
Impact of dental caries on the quality of life of adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
PR 1.19 [0.77, 1.84]3 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Impact of dental caries on the quality of life of adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
2025 All outcomes
January 2022; updated March 2024 (studies up until March 2024)22Not applicable

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.