Question · asked by 1 review
MET plus any intervention vs the intervention alone: Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale)
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
MET plus any intervention vs that same intervention alone Pain A 0 to 100 visual analogue scale, where 0 equals no pain at all and 100 is the worst pain imaginable · patients with non‐specific low‐back pain (LBP) Muscle energy technique for non‐specific low‐back pain (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 40 participants | Low |
MET plus any intervention vs that same intervention alone Pain A 0 to 100 visual analogue scale, where 0 equals no pain at all and 100 is the worst pain imaginable · patients with non‐specific low‐back pain (LBP) Muscle energy technique for non‐specific low‐back pain (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 30 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Muscle energy technique for non‐specific low‐back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.