Question · asked by 1 review

Extraction of third molars (wisdom teeth) vs No active treatment (control): Amount of crowding

It is very uncertain whether extraction of third molars (wisdom teeth) changes amount of crowding (Little's Irregularity Index, change) at 5 years compared with no active treatment (control) (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Extraction of third molars (wisdom teeth) vs No active treatment (control)
Amount of crowding (Little's Irregularity Index, change) at 5 years · Children or adolescents (aged 16 years old or under) receiving orthodontic treatment to prevent or correct crowded teeth · 5 years
It is very uncertain whether extraction of third molars (wisdom teeth) changes amount of crowding (Little's Irregularity Index, change) at 5 years compared with no active treatment (control) (very low certainty).
Orthodontic treatment for crowded teeth in children (2021) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD -0.30 [-1.30, 0.70]1 study · 77 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Orthodontic treatment for crowded teeth in children
2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
2021-01list not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.