Oral hygiene care training of carers vs No training (or a placebo training session) of carers: Behaviour, attitude and self-efficacy (carer experience) (medium term)
- Population
- People with mixed levels of ID (age range unclear); setting residential
- Intervention
- Oral hygiene care training of carers
- Comparison
- No training (or a placebo training session) of carers
- Outcome
- Behaviour, attitude and self-efficacy (carer experience) (medium term)
It is very uncertain whether oral hygiene care training of carers changes behaviour, attitude and self-efficacy of carers (medium term) compared with no training (or a placebo training session) of carers (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Oral hygiene care training of carers vs No training (or a placebo training session) of carers Behaviour, attitude and self-efficacy of carers (medium term) · People with mixed levels of ID (age range unclear); setting residential · Medium term (6 weeks to 12 months) It is very uncertain whether oral hygiene care training of carers changes behaviour, attitude and self-efficacy of carers (medium term) compared with no training (or a placebo training session) of carers (very low certainty). Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes | MD 0.15 [-0.80, 1.10] | 2 studies · 189 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2019-02 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.