Regular salmeterol vs salbutamol: Asthma‐related non‐fatal serious adverse events ‐ adults and adolescents
Regular salmeterol showed no clear difference in asthma‐related non‐fatal serious adverse events ‐ adults and… compared with regular salbutamol (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Regular salmeterol vs regular salbutamol Asthma‐related non‐fatal serious adverse events ‐ adults and adolescents · patients with chronic asthma Regular salmeterol showed no clear difference in asthma‐related non‐fatal serious adverse events ‐ adults and… compared with regular salbutamol (low certainty). Regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events (2008) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 0.94 [0.37, 2.34] | 3 studies · 1155 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events 2008 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.