Question · asked by 1 review

Beta‐lactam (ceftriaxone) plus aminoglycoside (gentamicin) vs beta‐lactam (ceftriaxone): All‐cause mortality during hospital stay and all‐cause mortality at 1 year

Population
people with infective endocarditis due to penicillin‐susceptible Streptococci
Intervention
Beta‐lactam (ceftriaxone) plus aminoglycoside (gentamicin)
Comparison
beta‐lactam (ceftriaxone)
Outcome
All‐cause mortality during hospital stay and all‐cause mortality at 1 year

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Beta‐lactam (ceftriaxone) plus aminoglycoside (gentamicin) vs beta‐lactam (ceftriaxone)
All‐cause mortality during hospital stay and all‐cause mortality at 1 year · people with infective endocarditis due to penicillin‐susceptible streptococci
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
A comparison of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extractedNot reportedNo studies found
Beta‐lactam (ceftriaxone) plus aminoglycoside (gentamicin) vs beta‐lactam (ceftriaxone)
All‐cause mortality during hospital stay and all‐cause mortality at 1 year · people with infective endocarditis due to penicillin‐susceptible Streptococci
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
A comparison of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD009880.PUB2, superseded
no estimate extractedNot reportedNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
A comparison of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis
2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.