Question · asked by 1 review
Home (point‐of‐use) fortification of foods with multiple micronutrient powders vs placebo or no intervention: Haemoglobin (g/dL)
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Home (point‐of‐use) fortification of foods with multiple micronutrient powders vs no intervention or placebo Haemoglobin concentration (g/L) · children 6 to 23 months of age Home fortification of foods with multiple micronutrient powders for health and nutrition in children under… (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 20 studies · 10509 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home fortification of foods with multiple micronutrient powders for health and nutrition in children under two years of age 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.