COMPARISON 1. ARIPIPRAZOLE vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTICS: Leaving the study early
- Population
- patients with schizophrenia
- Intervention
- COMPARISON 1. ARIPIPRAZOLE
- Comparison
- OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTICS
- Outcome
- Leaving the study early
COMPARISON 5. ARIPIPRAZOLE showed no clear difference in leaving the study early ‐ any reason compared with OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
COMPARISON 5. ARIPIPRAZOLE vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS Leaving the study early ‐ any reason · patients with schizophrenia COMPARISON 5. ARIPIPRAZOLE showed no clear difference in leaving the study early ‐ any reason compared with OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS (moderate certainty). Aripiprazole versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD006569.PUB4, superseded | RR 0.97 [0.78, 1.19] | 3 studies · 2908 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aripiprazole versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- COMPARISON 1. ARIPIPRAZOLE vs OLANZAPINE · patients with schizophrenia · 1 review
- COMPARISON 1. ARIPIPRAZOLE vs RISPERIDONE · patients with schizophrenia · 1 review
- COMPARISON 1. ARIPIPRAZOLE vs ZIPRASIDONE · patients with schizophrenia · 1 review
- COMPARISON 1. ARIPIPRAZOLE vs QUETIAPINE · patients with schizophrenia · 1 review
- COMPARISON 1. ARIPIPRAZOLE vs CLOZAPINE · patients with schizophrenia · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.