Question · asked by 1 review
Food and nonalcoholic beverage marketing (exposure) vs No, less, or less powerful food marketing: Dental caries
- Population
- Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
- Intervention
- Food and nonalcoholic beverage marketing (exposure)
- Comparison
- No, less, or less powerful food marketing
- Outcome
- Dental caries
Evidence on food marketing and dental caries is very uncertain (very low certainty); 1 of 2 studies found an association.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Food and nonalcoholic beverage marketing (exposure) vs No, less, or less powerful food marketing Dental caries · Children and adolescents aged 0-19 years · Predominantly high-income countries, Nonrandomized studies Evidence on food marketing and dental caries is very uncertain (very low certainty); 1 of 2 studies found an association. Association of Food and Nonalcoholic Beverage Marketing With Children and Adolescents' Eating Behaviors and… (2022) All outcomes | Vote counting: 1 of 2 studies (50%; 95% CI, 9%-90.5%) showed an association of public health harm; 1 moderate-quality study found a clear association with caries and 1 high-quality study found no association. | 2 studies | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Association of Food and Nonalcoholic Beverage Marketing With Children and Adolescents' Eating Behaviors and Health: A Systematic Review… 2022 All outcomes | March 2020 (updated; initial search April 2019) | 92 | Not applicable |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.