Question · asked by 1 review

Enamel matrix derivative (EMD; Emdogain) vs placebo or control: Marginal bone level change

Population
Patients affected by chronic, aggressive, or early onset periodontitis, with intrabony defects having an intrabony component of at least 3 mm
Intervention
Enamel matrix derivative (EMD; Emdogain)
Comparison
placebo or control
Outcome
Marginal bone level change

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Enamel matrix derivative (EMD; Emdogain) vs Placebo or control (same surgical or non-surgical intervention without EMD)
Change in marginal (radiographic) bone level · Patients affected by chronic, aggressive, or early onset periodontitis, with intrabony defects having an intrabony… · 1 year (time-points 1, 5 and 10 years planned)
Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain®) for periodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects (2009) · Cochrane All outcomes
No statistically significant difference between EMD and control for radiographic bone gain (three trials; P effect = 0.27, I2 = 78%).3 studiesGRADE not reported
Enamel matrix derivative (EMD; Emdogain) vs Placebo or control (same surgical or non-surgical intervention without EMD)
Change in marginal (radiographic) bone level · Patients affected by chronic, aggressive, or early onset periodontitis, with intrabony defects having an intrabony… · 1 year (time-points 1, 5 and 10 years planned)
Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain®) for periodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects (2005) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003875.PUB2, superseded
There was no statistically significant difference between EMD and control for radiographic bone gain (two trials).2 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain®) for periodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects
2009 · Cochrane All outcomes
2009-02Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.