Question · asked by 1 review
Humour‐based interventions vs usual care: Adverse events as N of participants with at least one adverse event objective
- Population
- patients with schizophrenia
- Intervention
- Humour‐based interventions
- Comparison
- usual care
- Outcome
- Adverse events as N of participants with at least one adverse event objective
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Humour‐based interventions vs standard care Adverse effects/events: at least 1 adverse effect ‐ as defined by individual studies · People with schizophrenia The review found no eligible studies for this question. Humour‐based interventions for people with schizophrenia (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Humour‐based interventions for people with schizophrenia 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.