Question · asked by 1 review

38% SDF plus oral health education vs oral health instruction plus tonic water: new root-surface carious lesions or restorations

Population
community-dwelling older adults with root caries
Intervention
38% SDF plus oral health education
Comparison
oral health instruction plus tonic water
Outcome
new root-surface carious lesions or restorations

SDF had a 62% preventative fraction; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating was reported.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
38% SDF plus oral health instruction vs oral health instruction plus tonic water
new root-surface carious lesions or restorations · community-dwelling older adults with root caries · 30 months, Hong Kong
SDF had a 62% preventative fraction; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating was reported.
A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent… (2023) All outcomes
Preventative fraction (%) 621 study · 323 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent teeth.
2023 All outcomes
December 202213Low / Critically Low

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.