Question · asked by 1 review
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Formocresol (FC): Clinical failure
- Population
- Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth
- Intervention
- Calcium hydroxide (CH)
- Comparison
- Formocresol (FC)
- Outcome
- Clinical failure
Calcium hydroxide (CH) may leads to higher clinical failure compared with formocresol (FC) (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 50%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 25%Moderate 1 · 25%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Formocresol (FC) Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 24 months Calcium hydroxide (CH) may leads to higher clinical failure compared with formocresol (FC) (low certainty). Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes | RR 3.83 [1.68, 8.74] | 1 study · 120 participants | Low |
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Formocresol (FC) Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months Calcium hydroxide (CH) probably leads to higher clinical failure compared with formocresol (FC) (moderate certainty). Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes | RR 1.87 [1.22, 2.89] | 6 studies · 332 participants | Moderate |
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Formocresol (FC) Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 months Calcium hydroxide (CH) led to higher clinical failure compared with formocresol (FC); GRADE not reported. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2014) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003220.PUB2, superseded | RR 1.98 [1.17, 3.37] | 5 studies · 302 participants | GRADE not reported |
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Formocresol (FC) Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 24 months Calcium hydroxide (CH) led to higher clinical failure compared with formocresol (FC); GRADE not reported. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2014) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003220.PUB2, superseded | RR 3.83 [1.68, 8.74] | 1 study · 120 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2017-08 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE) · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 1 review
- Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Ferric sulphate (FS) · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 1 review
- Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Portland cement (PC) · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 1 review
- Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) + sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.