Question · asked by 1 review

Higher drinking-water fluoride exposure vs Null / lowest drinking-water fluoride exposure (reference): Spine bone mineral density

Population
Females (all ages)
Intervention
Higher drinking-water fluoride exposure
Comparison
Null / lowest drinking-water fluoride exposure (reference)
Outcome
Spine bone mineral density

Among females in low-to-moderate-risk-of-bias studies, the reported spine-BMD estimate above 2.35 mg/L water fluoride was MD 0.07 g/cm2 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.24; ungraded).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Higher drinking-water fluoride concentration vs Null/reference drinking-water fluoride exposure
Spine bone mineral density · Females · Drinking water, Females, low-to-moderate risk-of-bias studies: above 2.35 mg/L vs null
Among females in low-to-moderate-risk-of-bias studies, the reported spine-BMD estimate above 2.35 mg/L water fluoride was MD 0.07 g/cm2 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.24; ungraded).
The association of fluoride exposure with bone density and fracture risk: a dose-response meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
MD 0.07 [0.11, 0.24]Not reportedGRADE not reported
Higher drinking-water fluoride concentration vs Null/reference drinking-water fluoride exposure
Spine bone mineral density · Females · Drinking water, Females, low-to-moderate risk-of-bias studies: 0.7 to 2.35 mg/L vs null
Among females in low-to-moderate-risk-of-bias studies, spine BMD was not statistically different from the null from 0.7 to 2.35 mg/L water fluoride (MD 0.06 g/cm2, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.12; ungraded).
The association of fluoride exposure with bone density and fracture risk: a dose-response meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
MD 0.06 [-0.01, 0.12]Not reportedGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
The association of fluoride exposure with bone density and fracture risk: a dose-response meta-analysis.
2025 All outcomes
Inception to August 26, 202574Not applicable
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.