Question · asked by 1 review
Gastric bypass vs biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (laparoscopic or open): SAEs
- Population
- participants with obesity
- Intervention
- Gastric bypass
- Comparison
- biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (laparoscopic or open)
- Outcome
- SAEs
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Gastric bypass vs biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (laparoscopic or open) Serious adverse events (SAEs) · participants with obesity The review found no eligible studies for this question. Surgery for weight loss in adults (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgery for weight loss in adults 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.