Poor / no tooth brushing habit vs Good tooth brushing habit: Dental caries
- Population
- Individuals in East Africa assessed for dental caries
- Intervention
- Poor / no tooth brushing habit
- Comparison
- Good tooth brushing habit
- Outcome
- Dental caries
Poor tooth brushing was associated with significantly higher odds of dental caries (OR 1.967, 95% CI 1.205 to 3.211); certainty not graded.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Poor / no tooth brushing habit vs Good tooth brushing habit Dental caries (presence) · Individuals in East Africa assessed for dental caries · Community- and school-based populations, East Africa Poor tooth brushing was associated with significantly higher odds of dental caries (OR 1.967, 95% CI 1.205 to 3.211); certainty not graded. Prevalence of Dental Caries and Associated Factors in East Africa, 2000-2020: Systematic Review and… (2021) All outcomes | OR 1.967 [1.205, 3.211] | 10 studies · 4927 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence of Dental Caries and Associated Factors in East Africa, 2000-2020: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2021 All outcomes | December 2020 | 88 | Not applicable |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Poor / no tooth brushing habit vs Good tooth brushing habit · Primary school children in Ethiopia · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.