Question · asked by 1 review

Bone-anchored intermaxillary traction (BAIMT) vs Removable mandibular retractor (RMR): Adverse effects / patient-reported (pain, self-confidence)

Population
Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or younger) with prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion)
Intervention
Bone-anchored intermaxillary traction (BAIMT)
Comparison
Removable mandibular retractor (RMR)
Outcome
Adverse effects / patient-reported (pain, self-confidence)

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Bone-anchored intermaxillary traction (BAIMT) vs Removable mandibular retractor (RMR)
Adverse effects / patient-reported (pain, self-confidence) · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or younger) with prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) · During treatment
Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) in children (2024) · Cochrane All outcomes
Majanni 2016: BAIMT associated with higher pain early in treatment than RMR (P<0.001); RMR negatively impacted self-confidence more than BAIMT at all time points (P<0.001).1 study · 38 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) in children
2024 · Cochrane All outcomes
2023-01Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.