Question · asked by 1 review
Bone graft with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) vs Bone graft without PRP: Implant failure
- Population
- Patients with insufficient bone below the maxillary sinus requiring dental implants
- Intervention
- Bone graft with platelet-rich plasma (PRP)
- Comparison
- Bone graft without PRP
- Outcome
- Implant failure
Bone graft with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with bone graft without PRP (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 1 · 50%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Bone graft with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) vs Bone graft without PRP Implant failure · Patients with insufficient bone below the maxillary sinus requiring dental implants · 2 years after loading Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus (2014) · Cochrane All outcomes | No statistically significant difference for implant failures. Per trial: Raghoebar 2005 1 failure in the PRP arm, OR 3.67 (0.12 to 113.73), P = 0.46; Torres 2009 (PRP only = 1, no-PRP only = 2), OR 0.50 (0.01 to… | 2 studies · 62 participants | GRADE not reported |
Bone graft with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) vs Bone graft without PRP Implant failure · Patients with insufficient bone below the maxillary sinus requiring dental implants · 0 to 2 years Bone graft with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with bone graft without PRP (low certainty). Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus (2010) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD008397, superseded | OR 0.61 [0.09, 4.27] | 2 studies · 91 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2014-01 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.