Intensive vs less intensive continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT): Patients free of RRT after discontinuing CRRT
Intensive showed no clear difference in patients free of RRT after discontinuing CRRT compared with less intensive continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Intensive vs less intensive continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) Patients free of RRT after discontinuing CRRT · patients with AKI Intensive showed no clear difference in patients free of RRT after discontinuing CRRT compared with less intensive continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (low certainty). Intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.12 [0.91, 1.37] | 5 studies · 2402 participants | Low |
Intensive vs less intensive continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) Patients free of RRT after discontinuing CRRT · patients with AKI Intensive showed no clear difference in patients free of RRT after discontinuing CRRT compared with less intensive continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (moderate certainty). Intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.98 [0.94, 1.01] | 3 studies · 988 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.