Chloral hydrate oral (50 mg/kg) vs sodium thiopental rectal (25 mg/kg): Proportion of children who successfully completed neurodiagnostic procedure without interruption by the child awakening
- Population
- children undergoing neurodiagnostic procedures
- Intervention
- Chloral hydrate oral (50 mg/kg)
- Comparison
- sodium thiopental rectal (25 mg/kg)
- Outcome
- Proportion of children who successfully completed neurodiagnostic procedure without interruption by the child awakening
Chloral hydrate oral (50 mg/kg) showed no clear difference in proportion of children who successfully completed neurodiagnostic… compared with sodium thiopental rectal (25 mg/kg) (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Chloral hydrate oral (50 mg/kg) vs sodium thiopental rectal (25 mg/kg) Proportion of children who successfully completed neurodiagnostic procedure without interruption by the child awakening · neurodiagnostic procedures in children Chloral hydrate oral (50 mg/kg) showed no clear difference in proportion of children who successfully completed neurodiagnostic… compared with sodium thiopental rectal (25 mg/kg) (moderate certainty). Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.95 [0.83, 1.09] | 1 study · 140 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Chloral hydrate oral (50 mg/kg) vs melatonin oral · children undergoing neurodiagnostic procedures · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.