Question · asked by 0 reviews
Antibiotics vs placebo: Serious adverse events
- Population
- Adults (aged 40 or over) with COPD presenting with 1 or more exacerbations in the previous year. The 2 larger studies (Albert 2011; Sethi 2010) recruited patients who required systemic steroids or antibiotics for exacerbations or patients on supplemental oxygen
- Intervention
- Antibiotics
- Comparison
- placebo
- Outcome
- Serious adverse events
What each review found
Include earlier review versionsNo findings match. Try fewer words or remove a filter.
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Antibiotics vs no intervention · newborns with congenital syphilis · 1 review
- Antibiotics vs 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) (mesalazine) · Patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis · 1 review
- Antibiotics vs probiotic · people with active UC · 1 review
- Antibiotics vs 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) (mesalazine) · people with active UC · 1 review
- Antibiotics vs placebo · people with active UC · 1 review
- Antibiotics vs no treatment · of active and inactive people with ulcerative colitis · 1 review
- Antibiotics vs placebo · Patients with active Crohn's disease · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.