Question · asked by 1 review
High-viscosity GIC atraumatic restorative treatment vs No control: Restoration survival
- Population
- Children with decayed primary molar teeth
- Intervention
- High-viscosity GIC atraumatic restorative treatment
- Comparison
- No control
- Outcome
- Restoration survival
Multi-surface ART restorations had a reported survival rate of 73% at 1 year.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 4 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
High-viscosity GIC atraumatic restorative treatment vs No control Restoration survival · Children with caries in primary molars · 1 year, Multi-surface Multi-surface ART restorations had a reported survival rate of 73% at 1 year. Minimal intervention dentistry for managing carious lesions into dentine in primary teeth: an umbrella review. (2022) All outcomes | Survival rate 73 | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
High-viscosity GIC atraumatic restorative treatment vs No control Restoration survival · Children with caries in primary molars · 1 year, Single-surface Single-surface ART restorations had a reported survival rate of 95% at 1 year. Minimal intervention dentistry for managing carious lesions into dentine in primary teeth: an umbrella review. (2022) All outcomes | Survival rate 95 | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
High-viscosity GIC atraumatic restorative treatment vs No control Restoration survival · Children with caries in primary molars · 2 years, Multi-surface Multi-surface ART restorations had a reported survival rate of 59% at 2 years. Minimal intervention dentistry for managing carious lesions into dentine in primary teeth: an umbrella review. (2022) All outcomes | Survival rate 59 | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
High-viscosity GIC atraumatic restorative treatment vs No control Restoration survival · Children with caries in primary molars · 2 years, Single-surface Single-surface ART restorations had a reported survival rate of 91% at 2 years. Minimal intervention dentistry for managing carious lesions into dentine in primary teeth: an umbrella review. (2022) All outcomes | Survival rate 91 | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimal intervention dentistry for managing carious lesions into dentine in primary teeth: an umbrella review. 2022 All outcomes | August 2020 | 35 | Low / Low |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- High-viscosity GIC atraumatic restorative treatment vs Amalgam or composite resin restoration · Children with occlusoproximal caries in primary teeth · 1 review
- High-viscosity GIC atraumatic restorative treatment vs Conventional restoration · Children with occlusoproximal caries in primary teeth · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.