Question · asked by 1 review
Dental cavity liner (e.g. calcium hydroxide, glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer, or flowable composite) placed under the restoration vs No liner (resin-based composite bonded directly to the tooth): Adverse events
- Population
- Adults or children with a Class I or Class II resin-based composite restoration in a permanent posterior tooth
- Intervention
- Dental cavity liner (e.g. calcium hydroxide, glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer, or flowable composite) placed under the restoration
- Comparison
- No liner (resin-based composite bonded directly to the tooth)
- Outcome
- Adverse events
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Dental cavity liner (e.g. calcium hydroxide, glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer, or flowable composite) placed under the restoration vs No liner (resin-based composite bonded directly to the tooth) Adverse events · Adults or children with a Class I or Class II resin-based composite restoration in a permanent posterior tooth The review found no eligible studies for this question. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin‐based composite restorations (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes | None reported. No adverse events were reported in any of the included studies (0 studies contributed adverse-events data). | 0 studies | No studies found |
Dental cavity liner (e.g. calcium hydroxide, glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer, or flowable composite) placed under the restoration vs No liner (resin-based composite bonded directly to the tooth) Adverse events · Adults or children with a Class I or Class II resin-based composite restoration in a permanent posterior tooth The review found no eligible studies for this question. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin‐based composite restorations (2016) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD010526.PUB2, superseded | None reported. No adverse events were reported in any of the included studies (0 studies contributed adverse-events data). | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin‐based composite restorations 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2018-11 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.