Question · asked by 1 review
Specialised early intervention (SEI) vs treatment: Mental state: 1b.Average end point score on various outcomes‐PANSS (medium‐term) ‐ Medium term ‐ PANSS general psychopathology end point score (low = favourable)
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Specialised early intervention (SEI) vs treatment Mental state: average endpoint score on a general mental state scale (general psychopathology, assessed by PANNS at end of treatment)g · recent‐onset psychosis (less than three years since the start of psychotic symptoms and either first or second… Specialised early intervention teams for recent‐onset psychosis (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 304 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Specialised early intervention teams for recent‐onset psychosis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.