Question · asked by 1 review
Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (pre‐operative PFMT + electrical stimulation versus pre‐operative PFMT): Adverse events ‐ not reported
- Population
- All men after radical prostatectomy
- Intervention
- Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment
- Comparison
- another active treatment (pre‐operative PFMT + electrical stimulation versus pre‐operative PFMT)
- Outcome
- Adverse events ‐ not reported
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (pre‐operative PFMT + electrical stimulation versus pre‐operative PFMT) Adverse events ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy The review found no eligible studies for this question. Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.