Question · asked by 1 review

Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs Educational intervention (oral hygiene education/instruction): Self-efficacy beliefs (flossing)

Population
Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis)
Intervention
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions)
Comparison
Educational intervention (oral hygiene education/instruction)
Outcome
Self-efficacy beliefs (flossing)

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs Educational intervention (oral hygiene education/instruction)
Self-efficacy beliefs (flossing) · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane All outcomes
Stewart 1996: the psychological intervention group demonstrated significantly higher change in self efficacy scores for flossing at post-intervention compared to the educational group (there was no difference in the…1 study · 78 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal diseases
2007 · Cochrane All outcomes
2004-12Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.