Question · asked by 1 review

Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) vs Any (current minimally invasive techniques): Not applicable (no eligible studies)

Population
Adults with coronal (crown) dental caries in permanent teeth
Intervention
Silver diamine fluoride (SDF)
Comparison
Any (current minimally invasive techniques)
Outcome
Not applicable (no eligible studies)

No eligible studies assessed SDF for coronal caries in adults; this is an evidence gap identified by the review.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) vs Any (current minimally invasive techniques)
Not applicable (no eligible studies) · Adults with coronal (crown) dental caries in permanent teeth
No eligible studies assessed SDF for coronal caries in adults; this is an evidence gap identified by the review.
A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent… (2023) All outcomes
The review states there was a lack of studies on the effects of SDF on coronal caries in adults; included adult studies addressed only root caries.0 studiesNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent teeth.
2023 All outcomes
December 202213Low / Critically Low
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.