Benefits and harms of CSF plus antibiotics vs antibiotics alone: Time to recovery from fever (lower values signify better outcomes)
Benefits and harms of CSF plus antibiotics showed no clear difference in time to recovery from fever (lower values signify better outcomes) compared with antibiotics alone (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Benefits and harms of CSF plus antibiotics vs antibiotics alone Time to recovery from fever (lower values signify better outcomes) · people with chemotherapy‐induced febrile neutropenia Benefits and harms of CSF plus antibiotics showed no clear difference in time to recovery from fever (lower values signify better outcomes) compared with antibiotics alone (low certainty). Colony‐stimulating factors for chemotherapy‐induced febrile neutropenia (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 9 studies · 966 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colony‐stimulating factors for chemotherapy‐induced febrile neutropenia 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.