Intermittent oral vs oral calcitriol: Fall in PTH
Intermittent oral showed no clear difference in fall in PTH compared with daily oral calcitriol (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Intermittent oral vs daily oral calcitriol Fall in PTH · patients with bone disease in children with chronic kidney disease Intermittent oral showed no clear difference in fall in PTH compared with daily oral calcitriol (moderate certainty). Interventions for bone disease in children with chronic kidney disease (2010) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.88 [0.65, 1.19] | 1 study · 59 participants | Moderate |
Intermittent oral vs daily oral calcitriol Fall in PTH % · patients with bone disease in children with chronic kidney disease Interventions for bone disease in children with chronic kidney disease (2010) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 83 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for bone disease in children with chronic kidney disease 2010 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.