Question · asked by 1 review
Corticosteroids vs placebo: Complete caloric recovery
- Population
- Patients with idiopathic acute vestibular dysfunction (vestibular neuritis)
- Intervention
- Corticosteroids
- Comparison
- placebo
- Outcome
- Complete caloric recovery
Corticosteroids may leads to higher complete caloric recovery compared with placebo (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Corticosteroids vs placebo Complete caloric recovery · Patients with idiopathic acute vestibular dysfunction (vestibular neuritis) Corticosteroids may leads to higher complete caloric recovery compared with placebo (low certainty). Corticosteroids for the treatment of idiopathic acute vestibular dysfunction (vestibular neuritis) (2011) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 2.81 [1.32, 6] | 2 studies · 50 participants | Low |
Corticosteroids vs placebo Complete caloric recovery · Patients with idiopathic acute vestibular dysfunction (vestibular neuritis) Corticosteroids showed no clear difference in complete caloric recovery compared with placebo (low certainty). Corticosteroids for the treatment of idiopathic acute vestibular dysfunction (vestibular neuritis) (2011) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.58 [0.45, 5.62] | 2 studies · 89 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corticosteroids for the treatment of idiopathic acute vestibular dysfunction (vestibular neuritis) 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.