Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings: Low sodium intake vs high sodium intake: Trigyceride mg/dL
- Population
- Participants with normal or elevated blood pressure, but otherwise healthy
- Intervention
- Summary of findings: Low sodium intake
- Comparison
- high sodium intake
- Outcome
- Trigyceride mg/dL
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings: Low sodium intake vs high sodium intake Trigyceride mg/dL · Participants with normal or elevated blood pressure, but otherwise healthy Effects of low sodium diet versus high sodium diet on blood pressure, renin, aldosterone, catecholamines,… (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 20 studies · 712 participants | High |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effects of low sodium diet versus high sodium diet on blood pressure, renin, aldosterone, catecholamines, cholesterol, and triglyceride 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.